Intel could beat AMD Ryzen on gaming performance — here's how

1. Domicile
2. News
3. Computers

Intel could beat out AMD Ryzen on gaming operation — hither's how

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Not 1 for playing the wallflower, Intel has come up out with a pretty hefty claim that its Core i7-10700K desktop processor is amend for gamers than AMD's Ryzen 9 3900XT.

At an APAC region presentation attended by WCCFtech, Intel claimed that in "real-earth" performance benchmarks, specifically gaming, its quad-core, 16-thread CPU beats AMD'due south 12-core, 24-thread processor. And Intel reckons its $387 slice of silicon is better value than the $499 Ryzen 9 3900XT; that's going by launch prices rather than retail prices at the moment.

• Everything we know nigh Intel Tiger Lake
• Here's what we know about the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
• Plus: PS5 and Xbox Serial X graphics revealed in stunning new video

Intel made such a merits by using the Core i7-10700K in a car with 16GB of RAM and a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, then running a suite of thirty games at 1080p resolution. It then claimed that the performance its chip yielded was equal to or amend than the Ryzen 9 3900XT in 24 of the 30 games.

For case, it claimed 23 percent more than functioning in Full War: Warhammer Two and 17 percentage more operation in League of Legends. Overall, the Core i7 chip was supposedly faster past more than three percent in 12 games and roughly equal to the Ryzen 9 CPU in a further 12 titles.

• Use a gaming VPN to eliminate throttling and lag

Getting to the core of performance

Information technology's worth contextualising all this. For a start, we don't know what type of motherboard the CPUs were running on. Information technology could be that the Core i7-10700K was using a high-end Intel motherboard, whereas the Ryzen nine 3900XT might have made do with a lesser motherboard, given both chips usd different CPU sockets and thus require different motherboards.

Secondly, the Core i7-10700K has a elevation single-core clock speed of 5.1GHz, whereas the Ryzen nine 3900XT runs upwards to 4.7GHz. While there are games and programs that can take reward of the actress cores the Ryzen 9 has, raw unmarried-core clock speed is often king in many games. And so the Core i7-10700k was going to be an obvious winner.

However, a 23 percent hike in performance in a game like Total State of war: Warhammer Two only results in an extra few frames per second. For some gamers that might be exactly what they're after, just for others, the existent-world difference is arguably negligible.

Only there's no contend that the Cadre i7-10700K is cheaper than the Ryzen 9 3900XT. Then if it's but gaming you're later on and you simply have the selection between those two fries, then the Core i7 would be the 1 to go for.

However, there are plenty of people who use their gaming PCs for more than only playing games. Some use such machines for video editing, where there are programs like Premier Pro that can take advantage of the extra cores a Ryzen 9 has to offer. And some gamers similar to stream their gaming exploits at the same time every bit playing, and having extra cores to offload a stream onto could justify the higher toll of the AMD CPU.

Our sibling site TechRadar besides broke down the concept of value that Intel was challenge. While the Core i7-10700K offers more bang for the buck in gaming performance compared to the Ryzen 9 3900XT, TechRadar pointed out that the octa-core Ryzen 7 3700X offers performance that's merely a trivial behind the 3900XT and thus the Core i7-10700K, yet costs $290. That makes it notably cheaper than Intel's chip and arguably better overall value.

In short, a lot of these claims are subjective. For a while, Intel always offered the more expensive CPUs, so it's good to see information technology bully to compete on price and take value into consideration.

When it comes to ownership a PC, such claims tin can make things confusing. So we suggest y'all cheque out our list for the best gaming PCs. And when it comes to making a gaming PC yourself, it'south worth taking the fourth dimension to really remember almost what you plan to use the PC for beyond gaming before y'all opt for a chip from either Intel or AMD.

Roland Moore-Colyer is U.M. Editor at Tom'south Guide with a focus on news, features and opinion articles. He ofttimes writes about gaming, phones, laptops and other $.25 of hardware; he's also got an interest in cars. When not at his desk-bound Roland can be plant wandering around London, often with a look of curiosity on his face.

Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/intel-could-beat-amd-ryzen-on-gaming-performance-heres-how

Posted by: crossbobre1995.blogspot.com

Share this post